Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to footer

News

January 24, 2018 in DevelopmentEDH FD

EDH Fire Department New El Dorado Hills Development Projects List

At the January 18, 2018 El Dorado Hills County Water District (EDH Fire Department) Board of Directors meeting, El Dorado Hills Fire Department’s Fire Marshal, Marshall Cox, provided a comprehensive list of current and proposed development projects in El Dorado Hills, and the immediate surrounding communities where the EDH Fire Department provides service, for the Board’s review.

Many residents are not aware that every project proposed in El Dorado Hills is reviewed by the El Dorado Hills Fire Department prior to moving through the approvals process. The Fire Department ensures that all projects are in compliance with fire codes – things like road widths, and building access and heights – to make sure that new projects can be served by EDH FD equipment, and that adequate water supply and fire hydrants are available to serve the project, and the project area, as well as many other criteria. The EDH FD doesn’t make recommendations about projects like the County Planning Services Dept, the Planning Commission, or the County Board of Supervisors (should it be built, should it be modified, is it an appropriate land use, is zoning correct, etc), they simply make sure that a project is in compliance with the fire code, and that the EDH FD has the resources to provide service to the project.

There are many projects on the list that residents my not be aware of, some new, as well as some that may have been forgotten (there are several older projects on the list), such as the Hampton Inn & Suites/Serrano on Saratoga and Arrowhead (which is now known as Sartoga Commercial), or “Town Center ACE Hardware” which currently has no available public information. Additionally, the EDH Fire Department does not monitor road improvement plans, like the new Country Club Dr realignment to Bass Lake Rd, so there are no road projects on the list.
A great aspect of this list is that it provides basic information for all the projects impacting El Dorado Hills in one document – as anyone who has tried to research projects on the El Dorado County website could tell you, there are multiple locations for project documents:

With all of these document locations, finding all the available information for any particular project can be overwhelming.

EDH FD Fire Marshal, Marshall Cox was kind enough to provide EDH APAC with an updated copy of the EDH FD New Development Report. APAC volunteers would like to thank Fire Marshal Cox, as well as the EDH Fire Department, for sharing this list, and for their commitment to helping to keep existing and new projects in El Dorado Hills as safe as possible.

Review the complete list in a single PDF document HERE

Here are some snapshots of the individual pages:
Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

January 17, 2018 in DR08-003-R Saratoga RetailEDH ApartmentsPlanning Commission

Planning Commission Approves Town Center Apartments, Denies Sartoga Retail Drive-Thrus

At the January 11, 2018  El Dorado County Planning Commission hearing, Commissioners approved the El Dorado Hills Apartments A16-0001 project by a 3-2 vote, and approved the findings for denial of the Saratoga Retail DR08-0003-R project.

The Saratoga Retail project, originally approved in 2009 as the Shops at El Dorado Hills as a compromise between area neighbors, El Dorado Hills residents, El Dorado County, and the developer to limit the project to a Walgreens pharmacy with a drive thru for phase one, and phase two would consist of ’boutique’ shops in two buildings, that would serve the local neighborhood, as well as El Dorado Hills, and would not be ‘tourist drawing in nature’. The applicant sought to modify phase two by reducing overall square footage of phase two, but sought to add a third building, and two drive thru fast-food restaurants.  The Planning Commission, after hearing from numerous residents in El Dorado Hills, decided to deny the project based on concerns regarding traffic/circulation, noise, aesthetics, environmental effects, and found that the project does not comply with the El Dorado County Zoning Ordinance’s parking requirements. The applicant can submit a revised project within 12 months, and additionally, has 10 days to appeal the ruling to the Board Of Supervisors.

The El Dorado Hills Apartments project was approved on a 3-2 vote, with District 1 Planning Commissioner Jon Vegna, and District 4 Planning Commissioner James Williams voting against approving the project. The project is scaled down from a previously approved project on the site (that is currently appealing litigation that stopped the project). Instead of a 250 unit complex, it has been downsized to 214 units, in two 4-story buildings, with one 5-story parking garage in the center. EDH APAC submitted a recommendation of non-support for the project primarily based on traffic impacts, land zoning/use conflicts, the loss of future sales tax  and transient occupancy tax revenues, the loss of retail/commercial space in the Town Center Planned Development, and a General Plan amendment, changing the voter approved El Dorado County General Plan standard for multi-family density from its current 24 dwelling units per acre, and essentially doubling it to 47 dwelling units per acre for this project. The project now goes to the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors for final approval. El Dorado County residents can still submit public comments, questions, and concerns, either supporting or opposing the project, to the Board of Supervisors. The hearing date for the project has yet to be scheduled.

January 8, 2018 in EDH APAC

EDH APAC January 2018 Meeting Agenda

The El Dorado Hills Area Planning Advisory Committee has published the agenda for the January 2018 regular meeting.

The meeting will be 7:00PM Wednesday January 10, 2018, at the El Dorado Community Services District Norm Rowett Pavilion on Harvard Way.
Event details are HERE

Guest Speaker

The meeting features guest speaker Executive Pastor Jarrod Weaver of Vintage Grace Church will present Vintage Grace’s plans for a new 23,000 square feet worship center and a 1,000 square feet field house.

Also speaking at the meeting will be District 1 Supervisor John Hidahl.

Projects and topics reviewed at the meeting include:

UPDATE– Actions taken by the Planning Commission at the December 14, 2017 Meeting with respect to the Saratoga Retail and Pavilions Memory Care Projects, and what comes next for these 2 projects. Formal APAC vote on Saratoga Retail Project.

UPDATE– Planning Commission Meeting on January 11, 2018. On the Agenda: Official Findings for Denial of Saratoga Retail project, AND Hearing to consider the El Dorado Hills Apartment Project. Updated APAC letter with respect to the El Dorado Hills Apartment Project in response to comments made in the Final Environmental Impact Report. APAC’s John Davey will lead the presentation and discussion on this.

UPDATES– on the Central El Dorado Hills Specific Plan, AND the lawsuit filed by Rural Communities United against the County of El Dorado and the Board of Supervisors to overturn the Oak Resources Management Plan and the Oak Resources Conservation Ordinance that were approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 24, 2017.

Nomination and Election of APAC officers for 2018

To complete the meeting, APAC will conduct its election of officers for 2018.

Agenda in PDF Format

January 5, 2018 in EDH APACEDH ApartmentsPlanning Commission

EDH APAC Submits Response Comments To El Dorado Hills Apartments Project Final Environmental Impact Report

The El Dorado Hills Area Planning Advisory Committee submitted response comments regarding the El Dorado Hills Apartments project A16-0001 to the El Dorado County Planning Commission in advance of their January 11 2018 project hearing.

Read the 12 page response letter HERE

The Project seeks to gain four entitlements that will permit the project to move forward with two 4-story apartment buildings comprised of 214 apartment units, and one 5-story parking garage at the corner of Town Center Blvd and Vine Street. The property is currently zoned for commercial development. It had previously been proposed to develop a hotel project on the site.

The four project entitlements are:

  1. General Plan Amendment adding a new Policy (Policy 2.2.6.6) under Objective 2.2.6 (Site Specific Policy Section) to increase the maximum residential density allowed in the General Plan from 24 dwelling units per acre to a maximum of 47 dwelling units per acre specifically for the 4.565-acre project site within the TCE Planned Development area identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 121-290-60, 61, and 62.
  2. El Dorado Hills Specific Plan Amendment incorporating multi-family residential use, density, and related standards for the project site. The project site would be designated as “Urban Infill Residential” within the Village T area of the EDHSP Plan.
  3. Rezoning of the project site from General Commercial-Planned Development (CG-PD) to Multi-Family Residential-Planned Development (RM-PD) and revisions to the RM-zone district development standards applicable to the proposed 214-unit apartment project
  4. Revision to the approved Town Center East Development Plan incorporating multi-family residential use, density, and related design and development standards for the proposed 214-unit apartment project within Planning Area 2 of the TCE Plan area.

In studying the project, EDH APAC volunteers were concerned with issues regarding the traffic impacts, loss of commercial space and associated employment opportunities, sales tax loss, transient occupancy tax loss,  non-compatible land use and conflict with the 1988 El Dorado Hills Specific Plan, and conflicts with the Voter Approved El Dorado County General Plan regarding a general plan amendment seeking to change the current multifamily residential density standard from a maximum of 24 dwelling units per acre, to 47 dwelling units per acres for this project.

El Dorado County continues to accept public comments on this project – to have public comments available to Planning Commissioners, comments should be submitted prior to January 10, 2018

Address public comments to:
County Planner Mel Pabalinas [ rommel.pabalinas@edcgov.us ]
Please be certain to cc: planning@edcgov.us and the Clerk of the Planning Commission, Char Tim [ charlene.tim@edcgov.us ]

January 4, 2018 in EDH Community Council

El Dorado Hills Community Council January Meeting

The El Dorado Hills Community Council has scheduled its January 2018 meeting and published the meeting agenda.

The meeting is being held at the El Dorado Hills Community Services District Norm Rowett Pavilion on Monday, January 8 2018 at 7PM.

Meeting topics include:

Supervisor Communications

  • El Dorado Hills Memory Care facility on Francisco Drive-construction started
  • County recognized for Economic Development-2017 ‘Paving the Way’ Award
  • Beatty Drive (aka Heaven) property clean-up and enforcement update
  • County sponsored “Community Funding Request’ (limit $5,000/project)

Leadership Team Progress Reports (~3 to 5 minutes each)

  • Public Safety- Recent accident on Green Valley Road at Loch Way
  • Economic Development- District 1 position filled by Glenn Krakow
  • Infrastructure- EDH Apartments at Planning Commission on 1/11/18
  • Good Governance- Charter Committee meeting highlights
  • Healthy Communities- County Oak Resources Management Plan
  • APAC- Projects on APAC’s January 10th meeting agenda
  • Community Information and Outreach- Econ. Dev First Flashvote results

Council Member Items

Next meeting is Monday March 5th, 2018

Meeting Agenda in PDF Format

Event Detail Page

December 28, 2017 in DR08-003-R Saratoga RetailEDH ApartmentsPlanning CommissionTown Center

Saratoga Retail Fast Food And Town Center Apartments Projects Back At Planning Commission Jan 11, 2018

The January 11 2018 meeting of the El Dorado County Planning Commission will feature the return of two El Dorado Hills Projects as separate hearings for Planning Commission approval.

The Planning Commissioners will consider Findings for denial for the Saratoga Retail project DR08-0003-R, that was conceptually denied by the Planning Commission on December 14, 2017. Commissioners will be voting to accept the Findings for Denial as presented by County Planning Staff. This project is a Design Review Revision, seeking to alter the original 2008 approved plan, by reducing over-all building square footage, and splitting the previously approved two buildings (buildings 2 and 3) into 3 buildings (buildings 2A, 2B, and 3 ) and adding two drive through fast food restaurants.

For the second El Dorado Hills project, the the Planning Commissioners will conduct a hearing to consider the El Dorado Hills Apartments project at Town Center East: A16-0001, Z16-0004, SP86-0002-R-3, PD94-0004-R-3. This project was continued from the December 14 2017 meeting at the request of the project applicant, the EDH APAC, and area residents, to allow additional time to fully review the project Final Environment Impact Report. This project is seeking approval to construct a 214 unit apartment complex, comprised of two 4-story apartment buildings, and a 5-story parking garage at the corner or Town Center Blvd and Vine Street.

The project needs to be granted four entitlements:

  1. General Plan Amendment adding a new Policy (Policy 2.2.6.6) under Objective 2.2.6 (Site Specific Policy Section) to increase the maximum residential density allowed in the General Plan from 24 dwelling units per acre to a maximum of 47 dwelling units per acre specifically for the 4.565-acre project site within the TCE Planned Development area identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 121-290-60, 61, and 62.
  2. El Dorado Hills Specific Plan Amendment incorporating multi-family residential use, density, and related standards for the project site. The project site would be designated as “Urban Infill Residential” within the Village T area of the EDHSP Plan.
  3. Rezoning of the project site from General Commercial-Planned Development (CG-PD) to Multi-Family Residential-Planned Development (RM-PD) and revisions to the RM-zone district development standards applicable to the proposed 214-unit apartment project
  4. Revision to the approved Town Center East Development Plan incorporating multi-family residential use, density, and related design and development standards for the proposed 214-unit apartment project within Planning Area 2 of the TCE Plan area.

Residents can submit public comments on these projects as late Wednesday January 10, 2018

17-1316
Agenda Item 2
Community Development Services, Planning and Building Department presenting Findings for Denial for the Saratoga Retail project (Design Review Revision DR08-0003-R) on property identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 120-690-07 and 120-690-08, consisting of 1.71 acres, in the El Dorado Hills area, that was conceptually denied by the Planning Commission on December 14, 2017; and staff recommending the Planning Commission take the following action: 1) Deny Design Review Revision DR08-0003-R based on the Findings for Denial as presented. (Supervisorial District 1)

Address public comments to:
County Planner Efren Sanchez [ efren.sanchez@edcgov.us ]
Please be certain to cc: planning@edcgov.us
As well as the Clerk of the Planning Commission, Char Tim [ charlene.tim@edcgov.us ]

17-0846
Agenda Item 5
Hearing to consider the El Dorado Hills Apartments project (General Plan Amendment A16-0001/Rezone Z16-0004/Specific Plan Revision SP86-0002-R-3/Planned Development Revision PD94-0004-R-3) on property identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 121-290-60, 121-290-61, and 121-290-62, consisting of 4.56 acres, in the El Dorado Hills area, submitted by The Spanos Corporation; and staff recommending the Planning Commission recommend the Board of Supervisors take the following actions: 1) Certify the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 201704217) based on the Findings presented; 2) Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15074(d), incorporated as Conditions of Approval; 3) Approve A16-0001 adding a new policy under Objective 2.2.6 (Site Specific Policy Section) in the General Plan increasing the maximum residential density allowed in the General Plan from 24 dwelling units/acre to a maximum of 47 dwelling units/acre for the 4.565-acre site within the Town Center East Planned Development

Address public comments to:
County Planner Mel Pabalinas [ rommel.pabalinas@edcgov.us ]
Please be certain to cc: planning@edcgov.us
As well as the Clerk of the Planning Commission, Char Tim [ charlene.tim@edcgov.us ]

Meeting Agenda
El Dorado County Legistar Calendar Links
Event Details

December 21, 2017 in EDC BOS

EDC Board of Supervisors December 19, 2017 Meeting Minutes Posted Online

The El Dorado County Board Of Supervisors has published their December 19, 2017 Meeting Minutes online.

PDF Format
Video Recording Format

Of note to El Dorado Hills residents:

Legistar File No. 17-1355
Agenda Item 7 – This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar.
Agenda Item Chief Administrative Office recommending the Board authorize the Chair to execute collection and indemnity agreements with the following special districts, on whose behalf the County has established development impact mitigation fees: El Dorado County Fire Protection District, El Dorado Hills County Water District (El Dorado Hills Fire), Garden Valley Fire Protection District, Lake Valley Fire Protection District, Mosquito Fire Protection District, Pioneer Fire Protection District, Rescue Fire Protection District, El Dorado Hills Community Services District, Georgetown Divide Recreation District.

Legistar File No. 17-1349
Agenda Item 13 -This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar.
Agenda Item Supervisor Hidahl recommending the Board accept the resignation of Larry Brilliant and Appoint Glenn Krakow as the District I representative to the Community and Economic Development Advisory Committee.

Legistar File No. 17-1288
Agenda Item 27 -This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar.
Agenda Item Community Development Services, Planning and Building Department, recommending the Board receive and file the Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2016/17. FUNDING: N/A

Legistar File No. 15-0760
Agenda Item 29 -This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar.
Agenda Item Community Development Services, Planning and Building Department, submitting for approval the Final Map (TM14-1519-F-2) for Carson Creek Unit 3, Phase 2 Subdivision, creating a total of 54 residential lots ranging in size from 3,250 to 5,700 square feet, and 1 lettered lot, on property identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 117-670-92 located on the south side of Golden Foothill Parkway, approximately 1,800 feet west of the intersection with Latrobe Road in the El Dorado Hills area, and recommending the Board consider the following: 1) Approve the Final Map (TM14-1519-F-2) for Carson Creek Unit 3, Phase 2 Subdivision; and 2) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign the Agreement to Make Subdivision Improvements for Class 1 Subdivision between the County and Owner, Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (Supervisorial District 2) FUNDING: N/A (Developer Funded Subdivision Improvements).

 

December 19, 2017 in DR08-003-R Saratoga RetailEDH ApartmentsPavilions Memory CarePlanning Commission

EDC Planning Commission Denies DR08-0003-R Saratoga Retail, Approves Pavilions Memory Care, Continues EDH Apartments

At the December 14 2017 El Dorado County Planning Commission meeting, Planning Commissioners voted 5-0 to deny the Saratoga Retail DR08-0003-R design review project, featuring three smaller buildings, comprised of two drive through restaurants, and one unidentified commercial tenant. Citing concerns that the design review was not just a “minor modification” of the original phase 2 of the project approved in 2009, as well as traffic issues, and land use conflicting with the nearby residential neighborhoods. Meeting minutes of the hearing have yet to be posted as of Monday December 18, 2017, but the El Dorado Hills Village Life has posted the following article:

The project originally approved by the commission in 2009 includes three commercial buildings totaling 30,628 square feet. Divided into two phases, Phase I consisted of the construction of a 13,263-square-foot building now occupied by Walgreens.

On Thursday the developer was back for approval of a modified Phase 2. Instead of two more commercial buildings, the revised plans included reducing the square footage of the commercial building by 6,907 square feet and constructing two drive-thru restaurants to be occupied by Chick-fil-A and Habit Burger.

Brad LaRue, CEO of United Growth and the project developer, called the revisions a minor design modification. He told county planners there were adequate parking spots for the new uses and requested an exemption from providing RV parking spots…

LaRue reiterated he was only requesting a minor modification to the original design and that should have required a staff-level decision rather than a public hearing. At the same time he promised to build the best development possible — one that would hopefully be enjoyed by people in the future.

Seeking some kind of compromise, District 1 Commissioner John Vegna asked if LaRue would meet with the homeowners to hammer out a “win-win.” Williams also asked if the developer would consider downsizing the project.

LaRue said he didn’t want to downsize the project any more than had already been done.

After planners conceptually denied the design modification they asked staff to return to the Jan. 11 meeting with the findings of facts as to the reasons for the denial with traffic being the main sticking point. The developer has the option of appealing the decision to the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors after the planners make their final decision in January.

The Planning Commission has directed County Staff to prepare findings to support their denial vote. The Project Applicant can appealing the findings to the El Dorado Count Board of Supervisors after the Commission has published their findings in January 2018.

Another project with a hearing at the same Planning Commission meeting was approved 5-0 by the Planning Commissioners. The Pavilions Memory Care project will create a 64 bed facility providing care for dementia and Alzheimer’s patients. Residents expressed concerns about mitigation measures for Oak Tree loss on the project, but several commentators agreed it would potentially be one of lower impact projects possible for the site.  The Village Life published an article with more details.

Also scheduled for the same Planning Commission meeting, the hearing for the El Dorado Hills Apartments at Town Center was granted a continuance until the January 11 2018 Planning Commission Meeting.

The Five hour, thirteen minute meeting is available as an audio recording on the County Legistar website. When available, meeting minutes will be posted to the APAC documents page.

 

UPDATED 12/19/2017 – The Meeting Minutes of the 12/14/17 Planning Commission Hearings have been posted online

APAC Document Files

December 18, 2017 in El Dorado Transit

El Dorado Transit Announces End To El Dorado Hills Taxi-Voucher Program

El Dorado Transit has issued a press release regarding the El Dorado Hills Taxi-Voucher program.

From the press release:

El Dorado Hills Taxi Voucher Program Discontinuance

Diamond Springs, CA, December 15, 2017 –

The El Dorado Hills Taxi Voucher Program is being discontinued effective February 10, 2018. El Dorado Transit and Gold Rush Taxi have provided this service to the residents of El Dorado Hills since October 2015.

Taxi vouchers will continue to be sold at distribution sites until December 31, 2017. Passengers may use Taxi Vouchers (valued at $3.00) to ride with Gold Rush Taxi until the end of business on February 10, 2018.

To provide transportation after February 10, 2018, El Dorado Transit will make more rides available using the Dial-a-Ride service. Passengers may use the vouchers as full fare on El Dorado Transit Dial-a-Ride in the El Dorado Hills Taxi Voucher service area through June 30, 2018.

Refund requests will be accepted through June 30, 2018. Program participants are asked to mail a completed reimbursement form and the unused Taxi Vouchers to El Dorado Transit at 6565 Commerce Way, Diamond Springs, CA 95619.       EDH Taxi Voucher Reimbursement Form

El Dorado Transit is currently developing a Request for Proposals that will be sent to all taxi companies in the area with the intent of launching the Taxi Voucher service in El Dorado Hills under a new contract.

December 15, 2017 in EDC BOSTIM FeeTransportation

El Dorado County Long range Planning Announces Revised TIM Fee Schedule

El Dorado County has published an updated Traffic Impact Mitigation (TIM) Fee schedule, approved by the Board of Supervisors at the December 12, 2017 BOS meeting.

Of note to El Dorado Hills residents is the increase for the Zone 8 (El Dorado Hills) fee structure for the overall residential rate of 2016/17 set at $19,885, to the revised 2017/18 rate of $20,928 per dwelling unit.

2017 TIM Fees – Effective February 10, 2018

EDU1 Fee per: Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8
 Residential
Cost per EDU 1 >>		 3,37731,31331,313 4,2605,016 6,124 4,630 20,928
 SFD Not Age Restricted 1.00 Dwelling Unit 3,37731,313 31,313 4,260 5,016 6,124 4,630 20,928
 MFD Not Age Restricted 0.62 Dwelling Unit 2,094 19,414 19,414 2,641 3,110 3,797 2,870 12,975
 SFD Age Restricted 0.27 Dwelling Unit N/A 8,455 8,455 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,651
 MFD Age Restricted 0.25 Dwelling Unit N/A 7,829 7,829 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,232
 Nonresidential
Cost per EDU 1 >>		1,958 18,162 18,162 2,471 2,909 3,552 2,685 12,138
 General Commercial 0.51 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 1.00 9.27 9.27 1.26 1.49 1.81 1.37 6.19
 Hotel/Motel/B&B 0.08 Room 157 1,453 1,453 197 232 284 215 971
 Church 0.10 Bldg. Sq. Ft.0.20 1.82 1.82 0.24 0.29 0.35 0.271.21
 Office/Medical 0.33 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 0.65 5.99 5.99 0.81 0.96 1.17 0.88 4.00
 Industrial/Warehouse 0.23 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 0.45 4.17 4.17 0.57 0.660.82 0.61 2.79
 1 “EDU” (equivalent dwelling unit) equals the demand placed on the transportation network relative to one single family detached dwelling unit.  EDU factors are expressed per dwelling unit for residential development, per room for hotel/motel/B&B, and per 1,000 square feet for all other nonresidential development.  Source:  Tables 4 and 14.

2016 TIM Fees – Effective February 13, 2017

EDU1 Fee per: Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8
 Residential
Cost per EDU 1 >>		 3,19029,50029,500 4,0174,739 5,830 4,382 19,885
 SFD Not Age Restricted 1.00 Dwelling Unit 3.190 29,500 29,500 4,017 4,739 5,830 4,382 19,885
 MFD Not Age Restricted 0.62 Dwelling Unit 1,978 18,290 18,290 2,490 2,938 3,614 2,717 12,329
 SFD Age Restricted 0.27 Dwelling Unit N/A 7,965 7,965 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,369
 MFD Age Restricted 0.25 Dwelling Unit N/A 7,376 7,376 N/A N/A N/A N/A 4,971
 Nonresidential
Cost per EDU 1 >>		1,850 17,110 17,110 2,330 2,748 3,382 2,542 11,533
 General Commercial 0.51 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 0.95 8.72 8.72 1.19 1.40 1.72 1.30 5.88
 Hotel/Motel/B&B 0.08 Room 148 1,369 1,369 186 220 270 203 923
 Church 0.10 Bldg. Sq. Ft.0.18 1.71 1.71 0.24 0.27 0.34 0.251.15
 Office/Medical 0.33 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 0.61 5.65 5.65 0.76 0.91 1.12 0.84 3.81
 Industrial/Warehouse 0.23 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 0.42 3.94 3.94 0.54 0.63 0.78 0.59 2.65
 1 “EDU” (equivalent dwelling unit) equals the demand placed on the transportation network relative to one single family detached dwelling unit.  EDU factors are expressed per dwelling unit for residential development, per room for hotel/motel/B&B, and per 1,000 square feet for all other nonresidential development.  Source:  Nexus Study.

 

Adopted TIM Fee Zones

Click on the map to view larger scale.