Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to footer

EDC BOS

Notice of Public Hearing Feb 23, 2021 Carson Creek Village Specific Plan Conceptual Review

J6 Conceptual Review at the Board of Supervisors

The County of El Dorado Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing in the Supervisors Meeting Room, 330 Fair Lane, Placerville, CA 95667 on February 23, 2021, at 1:00 p.m., to consider Pre-Application PA20-0002/Carson Creek Village Specific Plan Conceptual Review submitted by ANDREA MATARAZZO/PIONEER LAW GROUP for an Initiation Hearing (Conceptual Review) of a proposed Specific Plan that would allow medium- and high density attached and detached residential development with a potential build-out of 600 to 800 dwelling units, approximately 110,000 square feet of new commercial floor area, approximately 8.5 acres for a park and paseo site, and approximately 26.5 acres of open space. The property consisting of 98 acres, is located within the central portion of the existing El Dorado Hills Business Park, along the west side of Latrobe Road, north of the intersection with Golden Foothill Parkway

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download NOTICE [281.41 KB]

El Dorado Hills APAC Project Document Page

District 1 Supervisor Hidahl Shares Town Center Apartments Presentation At Feb APAC Meeting

At the February 21, 2018 EDH APAC meeting, El Dorado County District 1 Supervisor John Hidahl shared a presentation regarding the recent approval of the El Dorado Hills Apartments at Town Center East.

Public Comment and discussion is briefly reviewed in the APAC February 21, 2018 meeting minutes

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download Full Presentation [843.93 KB]

Board of Supervisors Approve El Dorado Hills Apartments at Town Center

In considering the recommendation of the El Dorado County Planning Commission of the proposed El Dorado Hills Apartments A16-0001, by a 4 to 1 vote, the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors approved a General Plan Amendment, an amendment to the 1988 El Dorado Hills Specific Plan, a revision to the PD94-0004 Town Center East Planned Development to permit multi-family residential, and a rezone of the subject parcels at the Tuesday February 13, 2018 BOS Meeting.

The vote to approve was:
District 1 Supervisor Hidahl: YES
District 2 Supervisor Frentzen: NO
District 3 Supervisor Verkamp: YES
District 4 Supervisor Ranalli: YES
District 5 Supervisor Novasel : YES

Video Recording of the hearing can be found HERE

HEARING – To consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission on the El Dorado Hills Apartments project (General Plan Amendment A16-0001/Rezone Z16-0004/Specific Plan Revision SP86-0002-R-3/Planned Development Revision PD94-0004-R-3) on property identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 121-290-60, 121-290-61, and 121-290-62, consisting of 4.56 acres, in the El Dorado Hills area, submitted by The Spanos Corporation; and staff recommending the Board take the following actions: 1) Adopt Resolution 016-2018 certifying the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 201704217) based on the Findings presented; 2) Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15074(d), incorporated as Conditions of Approval; 3) Approve A16-0001 adding a new policy under Objective 2.2.6 (Site Specific Policy Section) in the General Plan increasing the maximum residential density allowed in the General Plan from 24 dwelling units/acre to a maximum of 47 dwelling units/acre for the 4.565-acre site within the Town Center East Planned Development Area

A motion was made by Supervisor Frentzen to deny the project.
Motion Failed for lack of a second.
Public Comment: D. Manning, E. VanDyke, C. Burson, N. Burke, S. Noble, K. Beal, L. Parlin, L. Bentani, B. Smart, J. Wiley, J. Harn, R. Everett, S. Mundy, R. Hargrove, S. Hayley, S. Taylor, G. Helm
Supervisor Ranalli opened the public hearing.
A motion was made by Supervisor Veerkamp, seconded by Supervisor Hidhal to:
1) Adopt Resolution 016-2018 certifying the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 201704217) based on the Findings presented;
2) Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15074(d), incorporated as Conditions of Approval;
3) Approve A16-0001 adding a new policy under Objective 2.2.6 (Site Specific Policy Section) in the General Plan increasing the maximum residential density allowed in the General Plan from 24 dwelling units/acre to a maximum of 47 dwelling units/acre for the 4.565-acre site within the Town Center East Planned Development area identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 121-290-60,
121-290-61, and 121-290-62, based on the Findings presented;
4) Approve Specific Plan Amendment SP86-0002-R-3 amending the El Dorado Hills Specific Plan incorporating multifamily residential use, density, and related standards for the apartment project with the project site being designated as “Urban Infill Residential” within the Village T area of the El Dorado Hills Specific Plan, based on the Findings presented;
5) Approve Z16-0004 rezoning Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 121-290-60, 121-290-61, and 121-290-62 from General Commercial-Planned Development to Multifamily Residential-Planned Development, with revisions to the Multifamily Residential zone district development standards being applicable to the proposed 214-unit apartment complex, based on the Findings presented;
6) Approve Planned Development Revision PD94-0004-R-3 revising the Town Center East Planned Development incorporating multifamily residential use, density, and related design and development standards for the proposed 214-unit apartment complex within Planning Area 2 of the Town Center East Development Plan, with the proposed apartment complex being contained in
two 4-story, 60-foot-tall buildings and a 5-level, 60-foot-tall parking garage and other on-site amenities, based on the Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval presented;
7) Adopt Ordinance 5079 for said rezone;
8) Continue item for final action to occur with the adoption of the Resolution approving the General Plan Amendments considered by the Board during the “General Plan Window”, tentatively scheduled for February 13, 2018 (Item 32 on today’s Agenda); and
9) Include an additional Condition of Approval that the project applicant fee for the Intelligent Transportation Systems Master Plan Program (“ITS Program”) be kept in a separate account specifically designated for this project.
Yes: 4 – Veerkamp, Ranalli, Novasel and Hidahl
Noes: 1 – Frentzen

El Dorado County Board of Supervisors February 13 El Dorado Hills Apartments Hearing

The El Dorado County Board of Supervisors will conduct a hearing to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission for approval for the El Dorado Hills Apartments project A16-0001 on Tuesday February 13, 2018  tentatively scheduled for 1:00PM in the Supervisors Meeting room at 330 Fair Lane, Placerville, CA.

The Project seeks to gain four entitlements that will permit the project to move forward with two 4-story apartment buildings comprised of 214 apartment units, and one 5-story parking garage at the corner of Town Center Blvd and Vine Street. The property is currently zoned for commercial development.

The four project entitlements are:

  1. General Plan Amendment adding a new Policy (Policy 2.2.6.6) under Objective 2.2.6 (Site Specific Policy Section) to increase the maximum residential density allowed in the General Plan from 24 dwelling units per acre to a maximum of 47 dwelling units per acre specifically for the 4.565-acre project site within the TCE Planned Development area identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 121-290-60, 61, and 62.
  2. El Dorado Hills Specific Plan Amendment incorporating multi-family residential use, density, and related standards for the project site. The project site would be designated as “Urban Infill Residential” within the Village T area of the EDHSP Plan.
  3. Rezoning of the project site from General Commercial-Planned Development (CG-PD) to Multi-Family Residential-Planned Development (RM-PD) and revisions to the RM-zone district development standards applicable to the proposed 214-unit apartment project
  4. Revision to the approved Town Center East Development Plan incorporating multi-family residential use, density, and related design and development standards for the proposed 214-unit apartment project within Planning Area 2 of the TCE Plan area.

EDH APAC formed a subcommittee to research and review the project. The subcommittee report, which recommended non-support of the project as proposed, can be seen HERE. At the August 9, 2017 APAC meeting, Project applicants generously took time to make a presentation and answer questions about the project. Following this presentation, and a review of the subcommittee report, the full APAC committee voted 7-0 to accept the subcommittee recommendation of non-support. An article in the El Dorado Hills Village Life covered details of the meeting.  Following the meeting, APAC submitted its vote of non-support, along with the detailed subcommittee report, to the El Dorado County Planning Commission, El Dorado County Planning Services Dept, and the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors, and offered the report as a response to the project’s Draft Environmental Impact Report.  A copy of the August 9, 2017 Meeting Minutes can be found HERE

Upon the release of the Final Environmental Impact report in December 2017, EDH APAC offered additional comments to the EDC Planning Commission and EDC Planning Services Dept. concerning both environmental, and non-environmental issues not addressed by the FEIR – the full response can be read HERE.

On January 11, 2018 the El Dorado County Planning Commission reviewed the project and voted 3-2 to approve the project as proposed- with District 1 and District 4 Commissioners opposed.

  • EDH APAC members feel that the Planning Commission, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report, didn’t adequately address the major concern – a General Plan Amendment allowing the doubling of the 24 dwelling unit per acre multi-family residential standard to 47 dwelling units per acre for this project.
  • EDH APAC members ask: if the standard exists, why is it reasonable to grant an amendment to double it?
  • What benefit does it generate to the County, and more pointedly to El Dorado Hills? EDH APAC members see this as no minor variance.
  • APAC members don’t see the benefit to the County or El Dorado Hills. The sole benefit is that the project applicant will get to build their project.
  • EDH APAC members ask: Is this justification enough to amend the General Plan? EDH APAC members feel that the General Plan is a tool that exists to benefit El Dorado County residents, not as a tool to benefit a single development project, at the expense of residents.

As to the merits of the debate if it is better to allow the project site to stay vacant, or to move forward with this current project as proposed, EDH APAC members counter that the original proponents of the Village T Town Center East Planned Development sought in the early 90s to get what they wanted, and now have – a commercial center, and were rewarded with zoning to that effect. EDH APAC members suggest that the impacts of failure to develop the parcel in their development as granted by the originally requested zoning,  shouldn’t be forced to be borne by the El Dorado Hills community, or by the El Dorado County General Plan. Vacant or developed, the property has the zoning that was requested, and the ability to develop it rests with the owners, and the Town Center East Planned Development – if the project was seeking some simple, minor, modifications to develop the property, that would merit consideration – but a General Plan amendment is never minor.  EDH APAC members don’t believe it merits a General Plan amendment based on the benefits it seeks for itself, in lieu of the lack of benefit to the County, and El Dorado Hills.

Community members wishing to provide public comment or questions in support, or opposition to the project may submit those comments to the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors by Monday, February 12, 2018. Comments via email should be addressed the Clerk of the Board,a s well as to all five Supervisors, to be attached to the project file at the following addresses.

Project A16-0001 El Dorado Hills Apartments
Clerk of the Board edc.cob@edcgov.us
District 1 Supervisor bosone@edcgov.us
District 2 Supervisor bostwo@edcgov.us
District 3 Supervisor bosthree@edcgov.us
District 4 Supervisor bosfour@edcgov.us
District 5 Supervisor bosfive@edcgov.us

The EDH APAC Project Document file can be found HERE

 

El Dorado Hills Apartments At Town Center Board of Supervisors Hearing Feb 13, 2018

The El Dorado County Community Development Services Planning And Building Department has issued a Notice of Public Hearing regarding the A16-0001 El Dorado Hills Apartments at Town Center Project at the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors, on February 13, 2018 at 1:00PM.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The County of El Dorado Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing in the Supervisors  Meeting Room, 330 Fair Lane, Placerville, CA 95667 on February 13, 2018, at 1:00 p.m., to consider General Plan Amendment A16-0001/Rezone Z16-0004/Specific Plan Revision SP86-0002-R-3/Planned Development Revision PD94-0004-R-3/El Dorado Hills Apartments submitted by THE SPANOS CORPORATION to request the following: (1) General Plan Amendment adding a new policy under Objective 2.2.6 (Site Specific Policy Section) increasing the maximum residential  density allowed in the General Plan from 24 dwelling units/acre to a maximum of 47 dwelling units/acre for the 4.565-acre site within the Town Center East Planned Development area identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 121-290-60, 121-290-61, and 121-290-62; (2) El Dorado Hills Specific Plan Amendment incorporating multifamily residential use, density, and related standards for the apartment project. The project site would be designated as “Urban Infill Residential” within the Village T area of the El Dorado Hills Specific Plan; (3) Rezone of project site from General Commercial-Planned Development (CG-PD) to Multifamily Residential-Planned Development (RM-PD) and revisions to the Multifamily Residential zone district development standards applicable to the proposed 214-unit apartment complex; and (4) Revisions to the approved Town Center East Development Plan  incorporating multifamily residential use, density, and related design and development standards for the proposed 214-unit apartment complex within Planning Area 2 of the Town Center East Development Plan. The proposed apartment complex would be contained in two 4-story, 60-foot-tall buildings and a 5-level, 60-foot-tall parking garage and other on-site amenities. The property, identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 121-290-60, 121-290-61, and 121-290-62, consisting of 4.56 acres, is located on the northwest corner of Town Center Blvd. and Vine Street, within the Town Center East Planned Commercial Center, in the El Dorado Hills area, Supervisorial District 1. (County Planner: Mel Pabalinas) (Environmental Impact Report prepared, State Clearinghouse No. 201704217)

The Planning Commission has recommended approval of these applications based on the Findings and Conditions of Approval on file in Planning Services of the Planning and Building Department.

All persons interested are invited to attend and be heard or to write their comments to the Board of Supervisors at 330 Fair Lane, Placerville, CA 95667 or via e-mail: edc.cob@edcgov.us.
If you challenge the application in court, you may be limited to raising only those items you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence 
delivered to the Board at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Any questions regarding this project should be directed to the County of El Dorado Planning and Building Department, 2850 Fairlane 
Court, Placerville, CA 95667 or via e-mail: planning@edcgov.us.

Project Document Page

EDC Board of Supervisors December 19, 2017 Meeting Minutes Posted Online

The El Dorado County Board Of Supervisors has published their December 19, 2017 Meeting Minutes online.

PDF Format
Video Recording Format

Of note to El Dorado Hills residents:

Legistar File No. 17-1355
Agenda Item 7 – This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar.
Agenda Item Chief Administrative Office recommending the Board authorize the Chair to execute collection and indemnity agreements with the following special districts, on whose behalf the County has established development impact mitigation fees: El Dorado County Fire Protection District, El Dorado Hills County Water District (El Dorado Hills Fire), Garden Valley Fire Protection District, Lake Valley Fire Protection District, Mosquito Fire Protection District, Pioneer Fire Protection District, Rescue Fire Protection District, El Dorado Hills Community Services District, Georgetown Divide Recreation District.

Legistar File No. 17-1349
Agenda Item 13 -This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar.
Agenda Item Supervisor Hidahl recommending the Board accept the resignation of Larry Brilliant and Appoint Glenn Krakow as the District I representative to the Community and Economic Development Advisory Committee.

Legistar File No. 17-1288
Agenda Item 27 -This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar.
Agenda Item Community Development Services, Planning and Building Department, recommending the Board receive and file the Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2016/17. FUNDING: N/A

Legistar File No. 15-0760
Agenda Item 29 -This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar.
Agenda Item Community Development Services, Planning and Building Department, submitting for approval the Final Map (TM14-1519-F-2) for Carson Creek Unit 3, Phase 2 Subdivision, creating a total of 54 residential lots ranging in size from 3,250 to 5,700 square feet, and 1 lettered lot, on property identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 117-670-92 located on the south side of Golden Foothill Parkway, approximately 1,800 feet west of the intersection with Latrobe Road in the El Dorado Hills area, and recommending the Board consider the following: 1) Approve the Final Map (TM14-1519-F-2) for Carson Creek Unit 3, Phase 2 Subdivision; and 2) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign the Agreement to Make Subdivision Improvements for Class 1 Subdivision between the County and Owner, Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (Supervisorial District 2) FUNDING: N/A (Developer Funded Subdivision Improvements).

 

El Dorado County Long range Planning Announces Revised TIM Fee Schedule

El Dorado County has published an updated Traffic Impact Mitigation (TIM) Fee schedule, approved by the Board of Supervisors at the December 12, 2017 BOS meeting.

Of note to El Dorado Hills residents is the increase for the Zone 8 (El Dorado Hills) fee structure for the overall residential rate of 2016/17 set at $19,885, to the revised 2017/18 rate of $20,928 per dwelling unit.

2017 TIM Fees – Effective February 10, 2018

EDU1 Fee per: Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8
 Residential
Cost per EDU 1 >>
 3,37731,31331,313 4,2605,016 6,124 4,630 20,928
 SFD Not Age Restricted 1.00 Dwelling Unit 3,37731,313 31,313 4,260 5,016 6,124 4,630 20,928
 MFD Not Age Restricted 0.62 Dwelling Unit 2,094 19,414 19,414 2,641 3,110 3,797 2,870 12,975
 SFD Age Restricted 0.27 Dwelling Unit N/A 8,455 8,455 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,651
 MFD Age Restricted 0.25 Dwelling Unit N/A 7,829 7,829 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,232
 Nonresidential
Cost per EDU 1 >>
1,958 18,162 18,162 2,471 2,909 3,552 2,685 12,138
 General Commercial 0.51 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 1.00 9.27 9.27 1.26 1.49 1.81 1.37 6.19
 Hotel/Motel/B&B 0.08 Room 157 1,453 1,453 197 232 284 215 971
 Church 0.10 Bldg. Sq. Ft.0.20 1.82 1.82 0.24 0.29 0.35 0.271.21
 Office/Medical 0.33 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 0.65 5.99 5.99 0.81 0.96 1.17 0.88 4.00
 Industrial/Warehouse 0.23 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 0.45 4.17 4.17 0.57 0.660.82 0.61 2.79
 “EDU” (equivalent dwelling unit) equals the demand placed on the transportation network relative to one single family detached dwelling unit.  EDU factors are expressed per dwelling unit for residential development, per room for hotel/motel/B&B, and per 1,000 square feet for all other nonresidential development.  Source:  Tables 4 and 14.

2016 TIM Fees – Effective February 13, 2017

EDU1 Fee per: Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8
 Residential
Cost per EDU 1 >>
 3,19029,50029,500 4,0174,739 5,830 4,382 19,885
 SFD Not Age Restricted 1.00 Dwelling Unit 3.190 29,500 29,500 4,017 4,739 5,830 4,382 19,885
 MFD Not Age Restricted 0.62 Dwelling Unit 1,978 18,290 18,290 2,490 2,938 3,614 2,717 12,329
 SFD Age Restricted 0.27 Dwelling Unit N/A 7,965 7,965 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5,369
 MFD Age Restricted 0.25 Dwelling Unit N/A 7,376 7,376 N/A N/A N/A N/A 4,971
 Nonresidential
Cost per EDU 1 >>
1,850 17,110 17,110 2,330 2,748 3,382 2,542 11,533
 General Commercial 0.51 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 0.95 8.72 8.72 1.19 1.40 1.72 1.30 5.88
 Hotel/Motel/B&B 0.08 Room 148 1,369 1,369 186 220 270 203 923
 Church 0.10 Bldg. Sq. Ft.0.18 1.71 1.71 0.24 0.27 0.34 0.251.15
 Office/Medical 0.33 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 0.61 5.65 5.65 0.76 0.91 1.12 0.84 3.81
 Industrial/Warehouse 0.23 Bldg. Sq. Ft. 0.42 3.94 3.94 0.54 0.63 0.78 0.59 2.65
 1 “EDU” (equivalent dwelling unit) equals the demand placed on the transportation network relative to one single family detached dwelling unit.  EDU factors are expressed per dwelling unit for residential development, per room for hotel/motel/B&B, and per 1,000 square feet for all other nonresidential development.  Source:  Nexus Study.

 

Adopted TIM Fee Zones

Click on the map to view larger scale.

 

EDC BOS Publishes Minutes of December 12 2017 Meeting Online

The El Dorado County Board of Supervisors has published the minutes of their December 12, 2017 meeting, online.

Meeting minutes in PDF Format

Video Recording of the Meeting

Of note to El Dorado Hills Residents:

17-1296
Agenda Item 3
This matter was Approved and Resolution 181-2017 was Adopted upon Approval of the Consent Calendar.

Agenda Item Auditor-Controller recommending the Board: 1) Receive and file attached annual reports as required by SB 165 for Community Facilities District 1992-1 (CFD 1992-1 Serrano), Community Facilities District 2000-1 (CFD 2000-1 South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities JPA), Community Facilities District 2001-1 (CFD 2001-1 Promontory), Community Facilities District 2005-1 (CFD 2005-1 Blackstone), Community Facilities District 2005-2 (CFD 2005-2 Laurel Oaks), and Community Facilities District 2014-1 (CFD 2014-1 Carson Creek); and 2) Adopt and authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 181-2017 accepting said reports. FUNDING: N/A

17-1297
Agenda Item 4
This matter was Approved and Resolutions 182-2017, 183-2017 and 184-2017 were Adopted upon Approval of the Consent Calendar.

Agenda Item Auditor-Controller recommending the Board: 1) Receive Reports of Special Tax Delinquencies for Community Facilities District 1992-1 (CFD 1992-1 Serrano), Community Facilities District 2001-1 (CFD 2001-1 Promontory), and Community Facilities District 2005-2 (CFD 2005-2 Laurel Oaks); and 2) Adopt and authorize the Chair to sign Resolutions 182-2017 (CFD 1992-1 Serrano), 183-2017 (CFD 2001-1 Promontory) and 184-2017 (CFD 2005-2 Laurel Oaks) authorizing judicial foreclosures of delinquent special tax installments pursuant to the CFD 1992-1, CFD 2001-1, and CFD 2005-2 Bond Indentures.

17-1160
Agenda Item 6
Ordinance 5070 was Adopted upon Approval of the Consent Calendar. Supervisor Novasel registered a No vote on this item.

Agenda Item Chief Administrative Office recommending the Board approve Final Passage (Second Reading) of Ordinance 5070 rescinding County Ordinance 5040 (not codified) and amending County Ordinance 4832 (not codified) both regarding adoption of Proposition 90 – Property Tax Portability in El Dorado County. (Cont. 12/5/17, Item 41)

17-1234
Agenda Item 7 (Bass Lake North Sub Division)
Resolution 169-2017 was Adopted upon Approval of the Consent Calendar.

Agenda Item Chief Administrative Office recommending the Board adopt and authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 169-2017 accepting the exchange of property tax increments for the annexation of four parcels (APNs 115-400-06, 115-400-07, 115-400-08, and 115-400-09) into the El Dorado Irrigation District service area, Local Agency Formation Commission Project 2017-05. FUNDING: N/A

17-1336
Agenda Item 8
This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar.

Agenda Item Chief Administrative Office recommending the Board order the Auditor-Controller to process a journal entry transferring the amount of $40,829.62 from the El Dorado Hills Community Services District Development Impact Mitigation Fee Account (8963117) to the operating account designated by the District. FUNDING: El Dorado Hills Community Services District Development Impact Mitigation Fees.

17-1341
Agenda Item 10
This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar.

Agenda Item County Counsel recommending the Board: 1) Approve and Authorize the Chair to Execute an Agreement for Legal Services between El Dorado County and Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. for Legal Services Associated with the Representation and Defense of the County in the case Rural Communities United v. County of El Dorado, El Dorado County Board of Supervisors, El Dorado County Superior Court Case PC20170536, Petition for Writ of Mandate, California Environmental Quality Act (General Plan Biological Policies Update, Oak Resources Management Plan, Oak Resources Ordinance and In-Lieu Fee); and 2) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign a Budget Transfer transferring $200,000 from the General Fund Contingency to the County Counsel’s budget for contracted legal services. (4/5 vote required). FUNDING: General Fund. (No Federal Funds)

17-1284
Agenda Item 26
Supervisor Frentzen opened the public hearing.
A motion was made by Supervisor Ranalli, seconded by Supervisor Frentzen to Adopt Resolution 172-2017 and direct staff to:
1) Maximize the funding to El Dorado County with regards to development agreements to offset the impacts of the development; and
2) Move forwarded with a technical update for reconsideration of those Zones 2 and 3 projects be considered for inclusion into Zone 8 which would be due back to the Board by the end of March 2017.

Agenda Item HEARING – Community Development Services, Planning and Building Department, recommending the Board adopt and authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 172-2017, thereby adopting the 2017 Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Schedule Update, including the updates for cost adjustments in the Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Nexus Study. (Est. Time: 15 Min.) FUNDING: Funding for the Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Schedule Update is included in the adopted Fiscal Year 2017/18 budget and is provided by the Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program and Road Fund.

17-1342
Agenda Item 37
No Action Reported. All five Supervisor participated

Closed Session Item – Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 – Conference with Real Property Negotiator: Conference with Real Property Negotiator: This body will hold a closed session to give instructions to its negotiator for the Silver Springs Parkway to Bass Lake Road – South Segment Project (CIP No. 76108) regarding the real properties described as follows:
1) APN 115-030-04: John Nojan Khoshcar, a married man as his sole and separate property (John Khoshcar, Negotiator);
2) APN 115-030-15: Daniel Pierce, a married man, as his sole and separate property, as to an undivided 50% interest and Emily Duby-Pierce, a married woman, as her sole and separate property, as to an undivided 50% interest, together as tenants in common (Daniel Pierce and Emily Duby-Pierce, Negotiators);
3) APN 115-030-16: Carl E. Pohto and Laura E. Pohto, his wife as joint tenants (Carl and Laura Pohto, Negotiators);
4) APN 115-030-03: Martin Szegedy a married man, as his sole and separate property (Martin Szegedy, Negotiator); and
5) No APN Remnant Parcel directly east of APN 115-030-15 (no owner of record).
Instructions to El Dorado County’s negotiator will concern price and terms of payment. Kyle Lassner, Right of Way Supervisor, will be the negotiator on behalf of El Dorado County. The parties with whom El Dorado County’s negotiator may negotiate are those parties identified above and their agents and successors. (Est. Time: 20 Min.)

Also of interest:

17-1209
Agenda Item 32 (Cameron Park)
Supervisor Frentzen opened the public hearing.
A motion was made by Supervisor Ranalli, seconded by Supervisor Hidahl to:
1) Certify the Environmental Impact Report as adequate under the California Environmental Quality Act (Attachments E, F, and G);
2) Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15074(d), incorporated as Conditions of Approval (Attachment 2D);
3) Approve A11-0004 amending the General Plan Land Use designations for Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-350-57 from 1.28 acres of Commercial, 18.28 acres of Multifamily Residential, and 0.31 acre of High Density Residential, to 9.23 acres of Commercial and 10.64 acres of Open Space based on the Findings presented (Attachment 2C);
4) Approve Z11-0005 rezoning Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-350-57 from 1.28 acres of Community Commercial-Planned Development, 18.28 acres of Multi-Unit Residential-Planned Development, and 0.31 acre of Single Unit Residential-Planned Development, to 9.23 acres of Limited Commercial-Planned Development and 10.64 acres of Open Space-Planned Development based on the Findings presented (Attachment 2C);
5) Approve P11-0004 subdividing Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-350-57 into five lots consisting of three commercial parcels and two open space parcels, ranging in size from 1.17 to 9.47 acres based on the Findings (Attachment 2C), and subject to the Conditions of Approval presented (Attachment 2D);
6) Approve PD11-0003 as the official Development Plan for the Ponte Palmero community care facility consisting of three buildings (one per each commercial lot), consisting of a 50,510 square foot, 44-unit community care facility (Parcel 3), a 53,690 square foot, 46-unit assisted living facility (Parcel 2), and a 11,450 square foot clubhouse (Parcel 1) based on the Findings (Attachment 2C), and subject to the Conditions of Approval presented (Attachment 2D);
7) Adopt Resolution 191-2017 for said General Plan amendment (Attachment 2A); and
8) Adopt Ordinance 5076 for said rezone (Attachment 2B). (Supervisorial District 4)
Yes: 5 – Veerkamp, Frentzen, Ranalli, Novasel and Hidahl

Agenda Item HEARING – To consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission on the Ponte Palmero Project (General Plan Amendment A11-0004/Rezone Z11-0005/Parcel Map P11-0004/Planned Development PD11-0003), on property identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-350-57 consisting of 19.87 acres in the Cameron Park area, submitted by CPSL SPE DE, LLC; and Planning staff recommending the Board take the following actions: 1) Certify the Environmental Impact Report as adequate under the California Environmental Quality Act (Attachments E, F, and G); 2) Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15074(d), incorporated as Conditions of Approval (Attachment 2D); 3) Approve A11-0004 amending the General Plan Land Use designations for Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-350-57 from 1.28 acres of Commercial, 18.28 acres of Multifamily Residential, and 0.31 acre of High Density Residential, to 9.23 acres of Commercial and 10.64 acres of Open Space based on the Findings presented (Attachment 2C); 4) Approve Z11-0005 rezoning A

17-1210
Agenda Item 33 (Meyers Community Plan)
Supervisor Frentzen opened the public hearing.
A motion was made by Supervisor Veerkamp, seconded by Supervisor Ranalli
to:
1) Conceptually approve the Meyers Area Plan;
2) Conceptually approve the joint California Environmental Quality Act and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency environmental document consisting of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Environmental Checklist/Finding of No Significant Effect;
3) Conceptually approve a Resolution to amend the General Plan;
4) Conceptually approve an Ordinance to revise the County Zoning Ordinance-Title 130; and
5) Direct staff to analyze the additional costs required to implement the Meyers Area Plan and to provide the Board with such cost information prior to final action by the Board.
Yes: 4 – Veerkamp, Frentzen, Ranalli and Hidahl Recused: 1 – Novasel

Agenda Item HEARING – To consider the Meyers Area Plan updating the existing Meyers Community Plan, which currently serves as the comprehensive land use and zoning plan for the community of Meyers, consistent with the Lake Tahoe Regional Plan and the El Dorado County General Plan; and Planning staff recommending the Board take the following conceptual actions pending approval by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency: 1) Adopt the Meyers Area Plan; 2) Adopt the joint California Environmental Quality Act and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency environmental document consisting of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Environmental Checklist/Finding of No Significant Effect; 3) Adopt Resolution 180-2017 to amend the General Plan; 4) Adopt Ordinance 5073 to revise the County Zoning Ordinance-Title 130; and 5) Direct staff to analyze the additional costs required to implement the Meyers Area Plan and to provide the Board with such cost information prior to final action by the Board. (Est. Time: 30 Min.)

Event Document Page HERE

EDC Board of Supervisors Establish New Meeting Protocols – Reduced Time For Public Comment

At the December 5, 2017 El Dorado County Board of Supervisors meeting, the Board established new rules and protocols for accepting public comments on issues and projects before the board.

Previously, the Board’s rules and Protocol for public comment were:

Each individual public comment was limited to 3 minutes per topic.
An individual representing a group was allowed 5 minutes per topic.

The new rules are as follows:

PROTOCOLS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

  • Public comment will be received at designated periods as called by the Board Chair.
  • Public comment on items scheduled for Closed Session will be received before the Board recesses to Closed Session.
  • Except with the consent of the Board, individuals shall be allowed to speak to an item only once.
  • On December 5, 2017 the Board adopted the following protocol relative to public comment periods:
  • Time for public input will be provided at every Board of Supervisors meeting. Individuals will have three minutes to address the Board.
  • Individuals authorized by organizations will have three minutes to present organizational positions and perspectives and may request additional time, up to five minutes.
  • At the discretion of the Board, time to speak by any individual may be extended.
  • A total of 20 minutes will be allocated for public comment during Open Forum and for each agenda item to be discussed.
  • Public comment on certain agenda items designated and approved by the Board may be treated differently with specific time limits per speaker or a limit on the total amount of time designated for public comment.
  • It is the intent of the Board that quasi-judicial matters have additional flexibility depending upon the nature of the issue.
  • Individual Board members may ask clarifying questions but will not engage in substantive dialogue with persons providing input to the Board.
  • If a person providing input to the Board creates a disruption by refusing to follow Board guidelines, the Chair of the Board may take the following actions;
    Step 1. Request the person adhere to Board guidelines. If the person refuses, the Chair may ask the Clerk to turn off the speaker’s microphone.
    Step 2. If the disruption continues, the Chair may order a recess of the Board meeting.
    Step 3. If the disruption continues, the Chair may order the removal of the person from the Board meeting.

This protocol change was approved by a 5-0 vote of the Board.

These rules and protocols are in effect for the next El Dorado County Board of Supervisors meeting, to be held December 12, 2017.

EDC Board of Supervisors December 12 2017 Meeting Agenda Posted Online

The El Dorado County Board of Supervisors has posted their December 12, 2017 meeting agenda online.

There are several items of note for El Dorado Hills residents:

17-1296
Agenda Item 3
Agenda Item Auditor-Controller recommending the Board: 1) Receive and file attached annual reports as required by SB 165 for Community Facilities District 1992-1 (CFD 1992-1 Serrano), Community Facilities District 2000-1 (CFD 2000-1 South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities JPA), Community Facilities District 2001-1 (CFD 2001-1 Promontory), Community Facilities District 2005-1 (CFD 2005-1 Blackstone), Community Facilities District 2005-2 (CFD 2005-2 Laurel Oaks), and Community Facilities District 2014-1 (CFD 2014-1 Carson Creek); and 2) Adopt and authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 181-2017 accepting said reports. FUNDING: N/A

17-1297
Agenda Item 4
Agenda Item Auditor-Controller recommending the Board: 1) Receive Reports of Special Tax Delinquencies for Community Facilities District 1992-1 (CFD 1992-1 Serrano), Community Facilities District 2001-1 (CFD 2001-1 Promontory), and Community Facilities District 2005-2 (CFD 2005-2 Laurel Oaks); and 2) Adopt and authorize the Chair to sign Resolutions 182-2017 (CFD 1992-1 Serrano), 183-2017 (CFD 2001-1 Promontory) and 184-2017 (CFD 2005-2 Laurel Oaks) authorizing judicial foreclosures of delinquent special tax installments pursuant to the CFD 1992-1, CFD 2001-1, and CFD 2005-2 Bond Indentures.

17-1160
Agenda Item 6
Agenda Item Chief Administrative Office recommending the Board approve Final Passage (Second Reading) of Ordinance 5070 rescinding County Ordinance 5040 (not codified) and amending County Ordinance 4832 (not codified) both regarding adoption of Proposition 90 – Property Tax Portability in El Dorado County. (Cont. 12/5/17, Item 41)

17-1234
Agenda Item 7 (Bass Lake North Sub Division)
Agenda Item Chief Administrative Office recommending the Board adopt and authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 169-2017 accepting the exchange of property tax increments for the annexation of four parcels (APNs 115-400-06, 115-400-07, 115-400-08, and 115-400-09) into the El Dorado Irrigation District service area, Local Agency Formation Commission Project 2017-05. FUNDING: N/A

17-1336
Agenda Item 8
Agenda Item Chief Administrative Office recommending the Board order the Auditor-Controller to process a journal entry transferring the amount of $40,829.62 from the El Dorado Hills Community Services District Development Impact Mitigation Fee Account (8963117) to the operating account designated by the District. FUNDING: El Dorado Hills Community Services District Development Impact Mitigation Fees.

17-1341
Agenda Item 10
Agenda Item County Counsel recommending the Board: 1) Approve and Authorize the Chair to Execute an Agreement for Legal Services between El Dorado County and Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. for Legal Services Associated with the Representation and Defense of the County in the case Rural Communities United v. County of El Dorado, El Dorado County Board of Supervisors, El Dorado County Superior Court Case PC20170536, Petition for Writ of Mandate, California Environmental Quality Act (General Plan Biological Policies Update, Oak Resources Management Plan, Oak Resources Ordinance and In-Lieu Fee); and 2) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign a Budget Transfer transferring $200,000 from the General Fund Contingency to the County Counsel’s budget for contracted legal services. (4/5 vote required). FUNDING: General Fund. (No Federal Funds)

17-1284
Agenda Item 26
Agenda Item HEARING – Community Development Services, Planning and Building Department, recommending the Board adopt and authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 172-2017, thereby adopting the 2017 Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Schedule Update, including the updates for cost adjustments in the Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Nexus Study. (Est. Time: 15 Min.) FUNDING: Funding for the Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Schedule Update is included in the adopted Fiscal Year 2017/18 budget and is provided by the Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program and Road Fund.

17-1342
Agenda Item 37
Closed Session Item – Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 – Conference with Real Property Negotiator: Conference with Real Property Negotiator: This body will hold a closed session to give instructions to its negotiator for the Silver Springs Parkway to Bass Lake Road – South Segment Project (CIP No. 76108) regarding the real properties described as follows:
1) APN 115-030-04: John Nojan Khoshcar, a married man as his sole and separate property (John Khoshcar, Negotiator);
2) APN 115-030-15: Daniel Pierce, a married man, as his sole and separate property, as to an undivided 50% interest and Emily Duby-Pierce, a married woman, as her sole and separate property, as to an undivided 50% interest, together as tenants in common (Daniel Pierce and Emily Duby-Pierce, Negotiators);
3) APN 115-030-16: Carl E. Pohto and Laura E. Pohto, his wife as joint tenants (Carl and Laura Pohto, Negotiators);
4) APN 115-030-03: Martin Szegedy a married man, as his sole and separate property (Martin Szegedy, Negotiator); and
5) No APN Remnant Parcel directly east of APN 115-030-15 (no owner of record).
Instructions to El Dorado County’s negotiator will concern price and terms of payment. Kyle Lassner, Right of Way Supervisor, will be the negotiator on behalf of El Dorado County. The parties with whom El Dorado County’s negotiator may negotiate are those parties identified above and their agents and successors. (Est. Time: 20 Min.)

Also of interest:

General Plan Amendment for a Care Facility – Community Commercial-Planned Development, Multi-Unit Residential-Planned Development, and Single Unit Residential-Planned Development
17-1209
Agenda Item 32 (Cameron Park)
Agenda Item HEARING – To consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission on the Ponte Palmero Project (General Plan Amendment A11-0004/Rezone Z11-0005/Parcel Map P11-0004/Planned Development PD11-0003), on property identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-350-57 consisting of 19.87 acres in the Cameron Park area, submitted by CPSL SPE DE, LLC; and Planning staff recommending the Board take the following actions: 1) Certify the Environmental Impact Report as adequate under the California Environmental Quality Act (Attachments E, F, and G); 2) Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15074(d), incorporated as Conditions of Approval (Attachment 2D); 3) Approve A11-0004 amending the General Plan Land Use designations for Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-350-57 from 1.28 acres of Commercial, 18.28 acres of Multifamily Residential, and 0.31 acre of High Density Residential, to 9.23 acres of Commercial and 10.64 acres of Open Space based on the Findings presented (Attachment 2C); 4) Approve Z11-0005 rezoning

Community Plan – The BOS approved $250,000.00 in the 2018 budget for Community Planning – The Myers Area Plan is an existing plan that is being updated, but is an example of Community Planning that can take place in El Dorado County.
17-1210
Agenda Item 33 (Meyers Community Plan)
Agenda Item HEARING – To consider the Meyers Area Plan updating the existing Meyers Community Plan, which currently serves as the comprehensive land use and zoning plan for the community of Meyers, consistent with the Lake Tahoe Regional Plan and the El Dorado County General Plan; and Planning staff recommending the Board take the following conceptual actions pending approval by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency: 1) Adopt the Meyers Area Plan; 2) Adopt the joint California Environmental Quality Act and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency environmental document consisting of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Environmental Checklist/Finding of No Significant Effect; 3) Adopt Resolution 180-2017 to amend the General Plan; 4) Adopt Ordinance 5073 to revise the County Zoning Ordinance-Title 130; and 5) Direct staff to analyze the additional costs required to implement the Meyers Area Plan and to provide the Board with such cost information prior to final action by the Board. (Est. Time: 30 Min.)

Event Documents HERE
Event Details HERE