Agenda Item | Department of Transportation and County Counsel recommending the Board: 1) Make findings in accordance with Chapter 3.13, Section 3.13.030 of the County Ordinance Code, Contracting Out, that there are specialty skills and qualifications not expressly identified in County classifications in the performance of litigation representation for property acquisition matters and eminent domain; and 2) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign retroactive, perpetual Agreement for Legal Services between County of El Dorado and Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP for legal advice and litigation representation, review of resolutions of necessity, and property acquisition matters inclusive of eminent domain, concerning various Capital Improvement Program Projects, beginning June 6, 2022 DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND Transportation obtains right-of-way to construct projects listed in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). In the process of obtaining right-of-way, there may be a need for legal advice and litigation representation, review of resolutions of necessity, and property acquisition matters inclusive of eminent domain in order to construct the CIP projects. At the present time, the departments do not have staff with the necessary skills to perform this work as it requires very specialized skill sets that are not available in-house and it is not currently economically feasible to maintain those skill sets with full-time staff. Chapter 3.13 of the El Dorado County Code of Ordinances, Contracting Out, includes Section 3.13.030, Criteria, which establishes those instances where contracts may be awarded and work can be performed by independent contractors. It is recommended that the Board find that the legal advice and litigation work for property acquisition matter may be contracted out because the work requires specialty skills and qualifications not expressly identified in County classifications (Criteria 3.13.030 (B)). Transportation and County Counsel currently have an agreement for these services with Meyers Nave, A Professional Corporation (Meyers Nave), but plans to terminate this agreement upon approval of the new Agreement with Burke, Williams & Sorensen. The termination is a result of County Counsel’s main attorney from Meyers Nave leaving this firm to new employment with Burke, Williams & Sorensen. Meyers Nave has previously notified the County that they will not do any further work under the existing agreement unless the County agrees to a rate increase. The agreement with Burke, Williams & Sorensen rate is equal to the amount of the rate increase proposed by Meyers Nave. This will provide continuity on project litigation on various projects already in process.
This matter was Approved on the Consent Calendar |