24-1585 | 1 | 34. | Agenda Item | HEARING: To consider an appeal received from Wesly Tonks (P-A24-0001) appealing the Zoning Administrator’s August 21, 2024, approval of Bass Lake Family Apartments Tentative Parcel Map P24-0009 to subdivide a 5.682-acre undeveloped parcel to create two (2) parcels of 5.311-acres (Parcel A) and 0.371-acres (Remainder Parcel), on property identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number 115-410-011, consisting of 5.682-acres, located on the south side of Green Valley Road, at the intersection with Bass Lake Road, in the Cameron Park/Rescue area, within the Cameron Park Community Region, submitted by Affirmed Housing Group, and staff recommending the Board of Supervisors take the following action: 1) Deny appeal P-A24-0001 and uphold the Zoning Administrator’s approval of Tentative Parcel Map P24-0009 based on the Findings (Attachment G) and subject to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment H) as presented; and 2) Adopt and Authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 162-2024 (Attachment D), denying appeal P-A24-0001 of P24-0009 with Findings of Fact. (District 2) FUNDING: Privately-funded appeal
Public Comment: R. Vosper, T. Shulman, K. Elmer, M. Shulman, A. Goudie, K. Telley, F. Porter, K. McCarty, J. Elwood, S. Statee, R. Wilkins, T. Hubb, T. Doyle, R. Tully, L. Campbell
A motion was made by Supervisor Thomas, seconded by Supervisor Turnboo to:
1) Approve appeal P-A24-0001 and overturn the Zoning Administrator’s approval of Tentative Parcel Map P24-0009 based on the amended Findings of Fact in support of the appeal as follows: a) The CEQA categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15135 is found to be inapplicable to the project based upon the exceptions to the exemption for 1) cumulative impacts and 2) unusual circumstances as established by testimony at the hearing;
b) The environmental impacts of the totality of the project have not been properly studied nor addressed under CEQA and supported by public testimony;
c) Approval of the parcel map would conflict with El Dorado County Code Section120.44.030(C) based on evidence in the record related to the appropriateness of the remainder parcel and accordingly the parcel map is disapproved. Public testimony was also received demonstrating inconsistency with 120.44.030(A) & (B);
d) Approval of the parcel map would be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to the neighborhood based on the evidence in the record before the Board; and 2) Adopt and Authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 162-2024, approving appeal P-A24-0001 of P24-0009 with amended Findings of Fact.
Yes: 5 – Hidahl, Thomas, Turnboo, Laine and Parlin |