Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to footer

El Dorado County Planning Commission May 11, 2023 Meeting Minutes

Meeting in Video Recording Format

Of note to El Dorado Hills residents:

23-0889AGENDA #3 Hearing to consider Development Agreement DA22-0001 East Ridge Village submitted by Michael J. McDougall, MJM Properties, LLC to request approval of a Community Benefit and Development Agreement for East Ridge Village (2023 DA), a planned community within the Valley View Specific Plan (VVSP). Staff recommending the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors to take the following actions: 1) Find that the 1998 VVSP EIR and the 2015 Notice of Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 for the East Ridge Village Tentative Subdivision Map (TM14-1521) continues to be the relevant and adequate environmental analysis to address the impacts of completing the development of the East Ridge Village Project pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. 2) Enter and execute Development Agreement DA22-0001 between the County of El Dorado and East Ridge Holdings, LLC, El Dorado Land Ventures, LLC, and Valley View Realty Investments, LLC, for East Ridge Village, based on the attached Findings as presented.
Agenda ItemHearing to consider Development Agreement DA22-0001 East Ridge Village submitted by Michael J. McDougall, MJM Properties, LLC to request approval of a Community Benefit and Development Agreement for East Ridge Village (2023 DA), a planned community within the Valley View Specific Plan (VVSP). Staff recommending the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors to take the following actions: 1) Find that the 1998 VVSP EIR and the 2015 Notice of Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 for the East Ridge Village Tentative Subdivision Map (TM14-1521) continues to be the relevant and adequate environmental analysis to address the impacts of completing the development of the East Ridge Village Project pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. 2) Enter and execute Development Agreement DA22-0001 between the County of El Dorado and East Ridge Holdings, LLC, El Dorado Land Ventures, LLC, and Valley View Realty Investments, LLC, for East Ridge Village, based on the attached Findings as presented.

Chair Nevis opened the public hearing and upon conclusion of public comment and staff input, closed the public hearing.

A motion was made by Chair Nevis and seconded by Commissioner Vegna to: Recommend staff recommendations #1 and #2 with 3 additional items:
1) Staff should meet with the EDH Fire Department and EDH Community Services District and other interested agencies prior to the BOS consideration of the Development Agreement (DA) and provide an update.
2) The BOS should consider if PAYgo funds contemplated under the DA be prioritized to mitigate local road impacts.
3) The BOS should consider an additional term to be added to the proposed DA similar to the current Carson Creek DA section 3.9 regarding a regional connector road.


Yes: 5 – Commissioner Vegna, Commissioner Boeger, Commissioner Harkin, Commissioner Payne and Commissioner Nevis
23-0603AGENDA #4 A request by Chair Nevis that the Planning Commission consider topics to explore in order to develop future workshops at upcoming Planning Commission meetings. (cont. 3/23/23, item #3) The Planning Commission will discuss possible future workshop topics and consider future actions, including potentially sending an update to the Board of Supervisors regarding potential workshops. It will be recommended that this item be continued to a date certain. This item was considered by the Planning Commission on April 27, 2023 and was continued to the May 11, 2023 meeting (5-0).
Agenda ItemA request by Chair Nevis that the Planning Commission consider topics to explore in order to develop future workshops at upcoming Planning Commission meetings. (cont. 3/23/23, item #3) The Planning Commission will discuss possible future workshop topics and consider future actions, including potentially sending an update to the Board of Supervisors regarding potential workshops. It will be recommended that this item be continued to a date certain. This item was considered by the Planning Commission on April 27, 2023 and was continued to the May 11, 2023 meeting (5-0).

A motion was made by Commissioner Payne, seconded by Commissioner Harkin to forward the revised memo to the Board of Supervisors.

Yes: 5 – Commissioner Vegna, Commissioner Boeger, Commissioner Harkin, Commissioner Payne and Commissioner Nevis
Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download Minutes [122.87 KB]

Attachments